SRM: The First Decade

celebrating 10 years of SRM
celebrating 10 years of SRM

There is a particular kind of madness that grips people when they decide to leave perfectly good salaries behind and start something from scratch.

It might include a good helping of self-confidence, a light sprinkling of bravado, and a detailed business plan that doesn't survive initial contact with reality. In the case of Andrew Setchell, Stewart Robertson and Rory MacSween, who between them comprise the ‘S’, the ‘R’, and the ‘M’, of SRM - it also entailed the ability to respond rapidly to an unrelenting decade of events, and emerge smiling at the other end.

After 10 years in business, SRM Recruitment has grown from three men and an idea into one of London's most respected specialist recruitment consultancies - placing senior finance, tax, legal and M&A insurance professionals across the UK and internationally, with offices in London, Guildford and Welwyn Garden City, and a team of over 20 specialised professionals.

Easter 2015. Over the top.

The founding story began, as many good ones do, with a question that needed answering. Andrew Setchell had spent four years as an accountant at PWC before moving into recruitment in 1996, eventually running large teams at Michael Page and Robert Walters. By Easter 2015, he was considering the next decade, and wondering ‘why’? Why had the industry where he’d worked for twenty years traded genuine consultancy for the kind of relentless, funnel-driven, phone-bashing culture that made good recruiters miserable and clients feel like they were being processed rather than helped?

"I always wanted to do my own thing, but I'd never do it by myself," Andrew says. "I needed like-minded people." He found two.

Rory MacSween had come to recruitment via a rather more scenic route; the British Army, then Michael Page and Robert Walters, before carving out a niche in the then-nascent world of M&A insurance. Stewart Robertson, a Modern History graduate from Royal Holloway who had also come through the big corporate recruitment machine, had arrived at similar conclusions independently. "We were all having the same conversations," says Rory. "It felt very transactional, like you were turning a wheel. Hard to put your stamp on something."

What gave them the final push? A developing conviction that there was a ‘better way’ - borne of watching floors empty during the financial crisis, observing management endlessly meddling, and noticing the business become, as Andrew puts it, "all about volumes". "The big corporate firms believed the brand was bigger than the person," says Andrew. "But for a medium-sized player, it's far more relationship-driven.” The new way had to be different. More consulting, less funnel. More relationship, less brand.

They handed in their notices in March 2016, collected their bonuses, and launched SRM just as the country was about to vote on Brexit. "We thought: Conservative majority, remain wins, markets go boom, we catch the wave," recalls Stewart, with a rueful laugh. "Yeah."

The First Year: Hard Lessons and Good Hires

The early days had a certain chaotic energy. For a while Stewart worked from his back garden shed. Rory and Andrew sat at a shared WeWork at Fox Court, where the ping pong tables and complimentary evening beer represented either a wonderful startup ecosystem or a terrible productivity environment, depending on the time of day.

The business plan — built partly on the assumption that blue-chip client accounts would follow them from their previous employer — "was out the window within twelve months." More pressingly, litigation arrived in the form of legal letters from past employers, designed, as Andrew notes, "to take up oxygen." It worked, for a while, but was resolved. "It did take a toll," he says. "But it also tempered the risk. You learn a lot about people. And about each other.”

But the wins came. After ten or eleven months of grind, they had back-to-back strong months. The model was working. Rob McKay and Dave Kingston, two early hires who took a genuine leap of faith, are name-checked with real warmth; "they came when we were literally nothing, and remain central figures in the business today.”

The Decade in Brief: Brexit, Covid, and the M&A Freeze

SRM has been tested by just about everything the last decade could throw at it. Brexit, which was timed with spectacular bad luck to coincide with their launch, initially caused a sharp intake of breath before proving broadly manageable. Covid was different.

"Bar one client, all live mandates were cancelled or put on hold indefinitely," says Stewart. "Overnight." That single remaining client — who happened to complete an acquisition at the exact moment lockdown was announced and needed an entire finance function recruited — thankfully kept things ticking over. Then, almost as suddenly as it had stopped, the market came roaring back. 2021 and 2022 were "by far our most successful years." Brexit had thinned the pool of European talent, demand was surging, and SRM leaned hard into genuine consultancy; helping clients navigate everything from sponsorship licences to employment law.

Then came 2023. The M&A market, which had been running hot, cooled sharply as interest rates rose and deal flow dried up. "Summer 2023 was still pretty good," says Andrew. "Then the kids went back in September and it wasn't the same September as the year before."

They navigated it, as they have navigated everything, by staying lean, diversified — and doing what smaller, more agile ‘boutique’ firms can do better than large ones: pivot fast — "it's rare that every part of our business is pulling back at exactly the same time, and that is a strength not a weakness.”

What Makes SRM Different: ‘Relationship Led. Data Driven.’

Ask the founders what sets SRM apart and you get a consistent answer: they recruit experienced people, give them autonomy, and get out of the way. No KPIs. No call-rate targets. No boiler-room atmosphere. Flexible working was already the norm at SRM, before Covid ever arrived. "The least experienced person in our business has seven years of recruitment experience," says Andrew, "we gladly recruit people with grey hair. With no hair…" he adds with a knowing smile.

The approach — which they describe as closer to search than traditional contingent recruitment — is built on a simple observation: the best outcomes come from relationships, not volume. "You just need really good relationships to get the same return without the flannel," says Andrew. "The big firms didn't work that out because they thought the brand was bigger than the person."

The Next Ten Years

"Everything you hear is how quickly AI is going to change our world", says Stewart, sanguine but clear-eyed about the future. The consensus among the founders is that AI will help them work faster, but that the fundamental value of what they do — human judgment, market intelligence, discretion, the ability to sit over lunch and map out someone's career — is not something an algorithm can replicate. "I had lunch with a client last week," says Rory. "We drew up a list of businesses he was interested in. By 5pm I had him an interview at one of them. I can't envisage a world where AI does that. Human interaction can’t be overrated.”

Andrew has a bolder prediction: as AI takes over junior professional work and graduate hiring shrinks at the big firms, newly qualified accountants and lawyers will become rarer and therefore more valuable. "Supply goes down, price goes up.” As for what comes next for SRM itself: growth, yes. New sectors, possibly. Selling? "We've never seriously sat down and discussed it," says Andrew, adding, “we want to create a space for every employee to earn six figures.”

And the most important thing about the next decade? "If we have a business in ten years that still holds the values we set out with," says Rory, "I'd be incredibly proud of that.”

Record Profitability Masks Growing Tensions in the London Legal Market

London lawyers
London lawyers

London's legal sector delivered extraordinary financial results through 2025, with law firms posting record revenues and profits that appear to validate the city's continued dominance as a global legal hub. Partners at elite firms have celebrated unprecedented earnings, and the broader UK legal services industry demonstrated remarkable resilience despite economic headwinds. However, underneath all the champagne headlines and billion-pound fee announcements, multiple warning signs suggest the foundations supporting this success may be less stable than they appear.

Unprecedented Financial Performance

In 2025, collective revenues for UK law firms sailed past £52 billion, with elite firms capturing an ever-larger share.

Linklaters posted a record revenue of roughly £2.3 billion with profit per equity partner (PEP) at £2.2 million. Clifford Chance reported 9% revenue growth to £2.4 billion with partnership profit surging 11% to £944 million and PEP at £2.11 million. Ashurst broke through the £1 billion revenue barrier, growing 8% to £1.03 billion with PEP at £1.39 million. A&O Shearman's transatlantic merger created a £2.9 billion global heavyweight.

Mid-market firms continued to thrive. NatWest's 2025 survey showed median fee income growth reaching 12% in 2025, up from 10% in 2024. Across the top 100 firms, 84% reported profit increases, compared to 56% the previous year. Average PEP across top 50 firms rose 6.2%, with the highest-paid Clifford Chance member taking home over £7 million, according to City AM.

What Drove Growth

Transactional work rebounded strongly through 2025, with private equity fuelling London's most valuable mandates. Kirkland & Ellis recorded a landmark year, surpassing $1 trillion in announced M&A deal value globally.

The talent war also saw a dramatic acceleration. London firms hired 668 partners in 2025, a 21% increase from 2024, with US firms continuing to dominating growth. Top newly qualified salaries at US firms now stand at £200,000, which has forced Magic Circle firms to increase their salaries as well to remain competitive. 

Practice areas showed varied performance, according to NatWest’s 2025 survey. Private client teams led growth (34% of respondents), followed by residential property (14%). An optimistic 89% of firms expect fee income to continue to increase further in 2026.

Despite aggressive investments, firms managed to maintain discipline. Overall people costs declined from 65% to 64% of revenue. However, headcount growth expectations tempered for 2026, reflecting persisting economic uncertainties.

Warning Signs Emerge

Despite the impressive headlines, some concerning structural trends emerged. The most significant challenge comes from intensifying US firm competition fundamentally reshaping London's market. US firms including Latham & Watkins, Kirkland & Ellis and Simpson Thacher now generate larger UK revenues than legacy British firms. According to a 2025 Lawyer Magazine article, Kirkland & Ellis is on course to become the largest firm by UK revenue, which would be a watershed moment marking the first time a US firm achieved such dominance in what has traditionally been the preserve of homegrown institutions.

The compensation arms race poses serious sustainability concerns as well. The dynamics create what one senior partner described as an "impossible equation" of raising billing rates faster than costs while trusting realisation will follow. Some leaders have publicly called the pay explosion "not sustainable". Competition for talent is expected to remain intense through 2026, with law firms looking to make accretive hires which shift the dial in their favour, and escalating rainmaker pay continuing in spite of economic uncertainties.

Market consolidation has accelerated dramatically. The wave of legal mega-mergers, which include A&O Shearman, HSF Kramer, and announced combinations like Hogan Lovells with Cadwalader and Ashurst with Perkins Coie, signals that cross-Atlantic scale now matters more than tradition. These mega-combinations serve a relatively narrow market segment, potentially sharpening differentiation for independent UK firms.

However, demand patterns for practices have diverged. According to the Natwest 2025 Survey, while regulatory practices thrived, firms identified litigation (23%), family law (22%), and commercial work (21%) as most underperforming in early 2026. For some practices, regulatory oversight and margin pressure make certain areas structurally harder to operate profitably.

Mounting Client Cost Pressure

Corporate clients are becoming increasingly sophisticated and price-sensitive, expecting transparent pricing, faster turnaround and streamlined communication. Many of these clients have reassessed legal panels and budgets, pushing firms to justify rate increases or face work migrating to lower-cost providers or in-house.

According to the Legal MBA, legal services price inflation reached 6.7% in Q4 2025, significantly hotter than the 2.9% average for all other professional services. However, aggressive rate increases mask underlying problems. While 96% of firms increased hourly rates in 2025, cash flow predictability has become a major concern.

Nearly 90% of firms confirm increased write-offs, with 88% expecting further increases in 2026, which has risen sharply from 49% in last year’s report from BigHand. Write-off escalation also reportedly intensified by nearly 40% year-over-year. Roughly 90% reported increased client discounts and write-downs, with nearly one-third citing discounts of 11-20%.

Potentially the most concerning, the same BigHand report found that aged work-in-progress became the primary cash-flow pressure driver for 50% of firms, up from 32%. This suggests firms complete work but struggle to convert it into cash, whether due to client payment delays, billing disputes, or difficulty justifying full value. Revenue figures may appear healthy, but there's a widening gap between projected profitability and actual cash collected.

"With firm-wide AI integration becoming the rule, clients are pushing for efficiency gains to be passed down as cost savings. Instead, they're seeing another round of rate increases and reconsidering value," notes BigHand's Global Legal. This fundamental tension of investing in efficiency while raising prices creates a credibility problem with sophisticated clients.

The US Firm Threat and Strategic Responses

US firms bring a fundamentally different operating model, which challenges Magic Circle positioning. They generate higher revenue-per-lawyer globally, creating flexibility for higher compensation without proportionately compressing partner distributions. This derives from higher billing rates, leaner staffing pyramids, more selective partner promotion, and aggressive lockstep unwinding concentrating profits among fewer equity partners.

Quinn Emanuel reported London profits of £153.9 million in 2025, reinforcing its status as a financially compelling disputes platform. The firm's profitability demonstrates that specialist positioning with premium pricing can generate extraordinary returns without a full-service platform.

UK elite firms reposition their strategies in response. Freshfields, Clifford Chance, A&O Shearman and Linklaters all reported growth in US revenues, with the US accounting for increasing shares of total turnover. A&O Shearman reported £707 million in US revenues, which is 25% of total turnover. This has increased from 13% pre-merger. This strategic pivot represents a fundamental bet that future profitability requires substantial American revenue.

For UK talent, the challenge is existential. Why pursue Magic Circle partnership at £2 million PEP when US firms' London offices offer comparable compensation with better leverage, higher-profile work, and clearer international mobility paths? The profitability gap between elite and mid-tier players continues widening, and US firms systematically exploit this disparity.

Escalating Costs and Regulatory Pressures

London firms confront rapidly escalating costs threatening to outpace revenue growth. Rising operational costs are driven by salary inflation and investment demands in technology and compliance. Legal firms are facing cost increases that are consistently outpacing general inflation.

Technology investment becomes harder to defer as clients demand firms prove AI delivers measurable value, not just efficiency promises. While over half of the top 50 firms see benefits from AI, there's growing apprehension around price erosion that widespread AI adoption may create. The technology paradox is stark: firms must invest heavily in systems that may ultimately reduce the billable hours they can charge.

The Outlook for 2026 and Beyond

The outlook for London's legal market throughout 2026 presents a complex mixture of opportunity and uncertainty. Industry commentary suggests the UK legal services market is forecast to grow in 2026, with expansion expected across most core practice areas as conditions stabilise. From a recruitment perspective, 2026 is shaping up to be more active and opportunity-rich than recent years, suggesting firms remain confident about future demand.

Yet there are still potential hazards on the horizon. The market enters 2026 "not just active, but structurally evolving," shaped by three forces: continued US firm rise in London, sustained talent competition, and UK firms' strategic pivot toward deeper US exposure. This reflects where firms are placing long-term strategic bets about future profitability and competitive positioning.

Geopolitical pressures, cyber threats, and AI's disruptive potential create a challenging environment dividing firms and increasing the imperative for greater resilience. Economic pressure continues influencing business decision-making and client behaviour.

For firm leaders, strategic imperatives are clear. To drive profitable growth, firms need to distinguish themselves through effective execution rather than simply outspending competitors, with targeted investments in marketing and business development, carefully selected lateral hiring bringing genuine client relationships rather than just credentials, and fundamentally improved pricing strategy and financial controls. Leading firms now directly link partner compensation to working capital and lock-up performance, recognising pricing must be based on demonstrated value and supported with detailed budgeting tools.

The fundamental tension grows increasingly acute: firms invest heavily in technology for efficiency while billing predominantly by the hour, compete in a talent war pushing compensation above sustainable levels, and face sophisticated clients who understand exactly what they're purchasing and are prepared to move work elsewhere if the value equation doesn't make sense. As one industry observer notes with stark clarity, "2026 will be the last year for firms to get away with rate increases as standard practice".

The question facing London's legal market is not whether the city will remain a global legal hub; its advantages in legal system quality, concentration of sophisticated clients, time zone positioning, and accumulated expertise are too deeply embedded to disappear quickly. Rather, the critical question is which firms will successfully navigate the difficult transition from today's high-profit, high-cost equilibrium to whatever market structure emerges when mounting client pressure, technology-driven disruption, and intensifying competitive dynamics finally force fundamental adaptation. Those firms and firm leaders who mistake today's altitude and current profitability for permanent stability may find themselves dangerously unprepared when market conditions inevitably shift.

Get in touch

Gwen Shaw is a legal consultant at SRM – for advice on the market, support to hire, or help in securing your next legal career move, contact Gwen on gwendolynshaw@srmrecruitment.com or call +44 7957 986390.

US mergers and the narrowing strategic choices for UK law firms

US law mergers
US law mergers

The last two years have clarified something many UK law-firm leaders have privately suspected for some time: the centre of gravity in global legal services has decisively shifted west.

The merger that made this impossible to ignore was A&O Shearman; not simply because of its scale, but because of what it represents strategically. This was not a defensive tie-up, nor a regional expansion play. It was a recognition that the economics, client demand and competitive intensity of the modern legal market are increasingly set by the US, and that UK firms acting alone are structurally disadvantaged in that environment.

A&O Shearman has effectively become the reference point: a UK heritage firm choosing to hard-wire US strength into its core rather than compete from the outside.

From aspiration to inevitability: the US question

For years, UK firms pursued internationalisation through office openings, best-friend networks and selective lateral hiring in New York. Those strategies now look insufficient. US firms have continued to pull away on private equity penetration, partner profitability, litigation firepower and balance-sheet resilience - all while clients increasingly expect seamless transatlantic delivery. That context explains why recent and proposed combinations share a common feature: a US anchor.

The planned combination between Winston & Strawn and Taylor Wessing, trading as Winston Taylor, is illustrative. It is not about geographic coverage for its own sake; it is about marrying US litigation and disputes heft with a strong UK and European commercial platform. The logic is straightforward: high-stakes disputes and investigations are US-led growth engines, and UK firms need meaningful access to them.

Similarly, the proposed merger between Hogan Lovells and Cadwalader underlines how scale and US capital-markets credibility are becoming prerequisites rather than differentiators. If completed, it would lock in deep Wall Street capability alongside a global regulatory and transactional platform. The announced intent between Perkins Coie and Ashurst follows the same pattern. This is not a UK firm “adding” a US office; it is a structural combination designed to rebalance revenue mix, sector exposure and client access in favour of US-driven growth areas such as technology, energy transition and complex disputes.

Why UK-to-UK mergers no longer move the needle

What’s striking is not just the deals that are happening, but the ones that aren’t. Large UK-only mergers have largely disappeared from serious strategic discussion. Combining two UK firms may create domestic scale, but it rarely solves the underlying challenges: limited US revenue, shallow private-equity relationships, or the ability to pay and retain elite talent in New York and Washington.

In that sense, consolidation among UK firms increasingly feels cosmetic. It rearranges market share at home without materially improving competitive positioning abroad.

By contrast, a credible US merger offers:

  • immediate access to US-led clients and mandates
  • stronger litigation and investigations capability
  • higher revenue ceilings and partner earning potential
  • greater relevance to global GCs rationalising panel relationships

A word on timing

What’s changed most in the last two years is not appetite, but optionality. Five years ago, a US merger was one of several strategic routes open to UK firms. Today, for many, it is the only route that materially alters trajectory.

The firms moving now are doing so from positions of relative strength: choosing partners, shaping governance and setting the narrative. Those that wait risk negotiating from necessity rather than strategy; and in consolidation cycles, timing often matters as much as ambition.

A&O Shearman may ultimately be remembered less as the biggest merger of its era, and more as the moment when the market quietly accepted that the future of elite UK law firms is increasingly inseparable from the US.

Recruitment is where this strategy becomes real

If mergers are the headline, recruitment is the proof. At the top end of the market, partner and senior associate expectations are increasingly shaped by US compensation bands, faster progression, deeper benches and clearer sector focus. Firms with meaningful US integration are simply better placed to compete for that talent, both offensively and defensively.

For UK firms without a credible US story, recruitment friction is becoming more visible:

  • high-performing partners question long-term earnings ceilings
  • associates compare transatlantic exit options earlier in their careers
  • and lateral conversations increasingly start with one question: “What’s the US angle?”

Conversely, firms pursuing US mergers are not just buying scale, they are resetting their talent proposition. Access to US workstreams, cross-border origination credit and globally competitive remuneration frameworks changes who will listen, who will move and who will stay. In that sense, recruitment may be the clearest signal of where this market is heading. The firms that solve the US question structurally will continue to attract disproportionate talent; those that don’t may find the war for people is lost long before the war for clients even begins.

get in touch

If you need help to hire legal professionals for your firm, or seek your next legal career move, please get in touch with Chris Excell, Head of Legal Recruitment on chrisexcell@srmrecruitment.com or call +44 (0)7946 142731

Legal Movers & Shakers in 2025: Lateral Partner Moves in Q3

Q3 legal partner moves
Q3 legal partner moves

The London legal market witnessed a particularly active summer in 2025, with more than 120 partners switching firms across a broad range of practice areas. From US firms aggressively expanding their London presence to UK outfits consolidating or losing key talent, the dynamics of the market underscore London’s continued role as one of the most competitive legal centres globally.

As anticipated, the frenetic pace of hires this year slowed slightly over the summer months, but the overall number of hires is still high especially compared to last year. YPOG entered the London market strong, making the most lateral hires of any firm with their recruitment of the Withers team. Conversely, Eversheds, Withers and Dechert fared the worst for attrition, losing seven, six and five partners respectively. Of the 135 moves collated in our data, 22% of them featured female partners.

Key Trends by Practice Area

Banking & Finance

Banking and finance saw the highest volume of movement. Naomi Roper moved from Capsticks to Penningtons, while Sudhir Nair left White & Case for DLA Piper. Freshfields hired the team of David Seymour and Will Bryant in July. Meanwhile, Claire Puddicombe, Daniel Tobias, David Quirolo and Alexander Collins all joined Orrick from Cadwalader.

US firms were highly active: Philip Baynes moved from A&O Shearman to Weil reinforcing its finance platform; Simpson Thacher brought Rick Hanson across from Cadwalader; and, Goodwin hired Matthew Ayre from Travers Smith.

Disputes

Disputes and arbitration saw significant moves, with boutique firms expanding. Andrew Hutchinson left Simmons & Simmons for Carpmaels & Ransford, Stewarts hired Rovine Chandrasekera from Stephenson Harwood, and Signature Litigation hired Duncan Grieve from Cadwalader and Mark Beardsworth from Goodwin.

US firms also continued their hiring spree in this area: Miles Robinson joined Squire Patton Boggs from Mayer Brown; Proskauer hired Jonathan Egerton-Peters from Steptoe and Deborah Polden from Eversheds; and, Michael Darowski joined Reed Smith from McDermott.

Ropes & Gray, though losing two finance partners to Freshfields, responded by adding Cataldo Piccaretta from Latham & Watkins in September.

Corporate

Corporate partner mobility was expectedly robust, with both UK and US firms making a number of key hires to deepen their benches.

Morrison Foerster recruited David D’Souza and Ambarish Dash from HSF Kramer. Cooley picked up Jonathan Cohen from Ashurst. Greenberg Traurig hired Elias Hayek from Squire Patton Boggs, while Matthew Sperry joined Cadwalader from Katten.

Notable Moves 

  • DWF has hired a 27-strong major injury and casualty team from Kennedys, led by Richard West, Claire Mulligan, Gareth Thomas and Jennifer Harris. This group follows the 13-person marine insurance team they hired in February.
  • Orrick recruited an 8-partner finance team from Cadwalader, in the US and London – the London partners include David Quirolo, Claire Puddicombe, Daniel Tobias and Alexander Collins.
  • German tech firm YPOG has hired a team from Withers, led by James Shaw, to open their first international office in London.
  • Crowell & Moring hired an 18-lawyer patent team from Dentons, led by Justin Hill.

Looking Ahead

The lateral partner market in London shows no signs of cooling:

  • US firms still on the offensive: Morrison Foerster, Weil, and Paul Weiss are unlikely to slow their London expansion, especially in finance, funds and disputes.
  • Restructuring to rise: With increasing macro-economic pressures, restructuring hires (currently modest, e.g., Kon Asimacopoulos to Squire Patton Boggs) are expected to grow significantly.
  • Energy & ESG-driven work: Energy transition mandates and ESG regulation are set to boost hiring in both energy and disputes practices.

Legal Movers and Shakers in 2025: Lateral Moves in Q2

Legal partner hires
Legal partner hires

In the first half of 2025, the number of lateral partner moves considerably increased from 2024, with Edwards Gibson reporting that there have been 349 partner moves, a 25% increase from the first half of 2024.  

Specifically, the second quarter of 2025 saw exceptionally high levels of lateral partner movement in London’s legal market. This wave of mobility has been influenced by several key trends:

  • the fallout of major law firm mergers,
  • strategic repositioning in key sectors such as banking and finance, disputes, and energy, and
  • continued interest in flexible or boutique platforms.

We have compiled a selection of 150 lateral partner moves that occurred (or were at least announced) in April, May, and June 2025. We sourced these moves from a variety of legal publications and online databases, and using this snapshot of the market we have analysed a number of trends happening in the market, and what we might expect to see for the latter half of 2025.

Overall, Baker McKenzie, Jones Day, and Pinsent Masons led the charge in hiring, with many other firms like Addleshaw Goddard, BCLP and MWE following closely. Banking and finance made up about 30% of the hires from our dataset, while corporate and disputes drew about even with roughly 15% each. Female partner moves made up roughly 29% of our data, which is on par with our data from Q1.

Banking and Finance: The Epicentre of Lateral Movement

The most active practice in our data by a significant margin was banking and finance, accounting for over 30 partner moves in the three-month period. Firms like Dechert, Addleshaw Goddard, Baker Botts, Paul Weiss, and Gibson Dunn were prominent recruiters, while the merged A&O Shearman saw a notable number of high-profile departures.

  • A&O Shearman lost at least five banking and finance partners; Barnabas Reynolds who joined Sullivan & Cromwell, and Franz Ranero and James Smallwood who both left for Latham & Watkins.
  • Paul Weiss continued aggressive expansion in London, poaching Cameron Roper from Proskauer Rose and Nick Charlwood from A&O Shearman.
  • Dechert brought in a four-lawyer team including Sushila Nayal and James Jirtle from Orrick.

Disputes Remains a Strategic Battleground

Dispute resolution remained one of the most mobile practice areas with 21 moves, reflecting strong client demand and firm competition for litigation talent.

  • Jones Day recruited multiple high-profile disputes partners:  Philip Pfeffer from HSF Kramer, as well as Samantha Silver and Natalie Smyth from Kennedys.
  • Schjødt, a Norwegian firm new to London, made bold moves into disputes with hires like Nick Barber and Cristan Evans from Stephenson Harwood.

Real Estate and Infrastructure: Surging Activity Amid Market Confidence

Surprisingly, real estate and infrastructure saw strong lateral activity, indicating renewed investor confidence and infrastructure project momentum.

  • Over 15 moves in real estate, including Paul Dineen joining KPMG from DLA Piper, Simon Price joining Bird & Bird from Mayer Brown, and HSF Kramer hiring Alison Hardy from Ashurst to lead their real estate disputes team.
  • Infrastructure also saw some notable moves including Richard Ceeney, who moved from Reed Smith to Greenberg Traurig, and Katie Hicks, who joined Milbank from White & Case.

Gender Representation and Progress

Female partner mobility remained moderate, with around 29% of the movers being women, reflecting ongoing gender imbalance at the senior level.

  • Notable female movers included Katie Hicks (Milbank), Emma Wright (Crowell & Moring), and Virginia Allen (Greenberg Traurig).
  • Firms like Fieldfisher, Baker Botts, and Simpson Thacher made multiple female partner hires.

Boutique and Alternative Platforms on the Rise

Platforms like Keystone Law and Broadfield saw multiple hires, suggesting a growing preference for flexible, partner-led platforms among senior lawyers seeking independence or a better work-life balance.

  • Keystone Law brought in a number of new partners, which carries over their strong partner acquisition strategy from Q1.
  • Broadfield hired a 2-partner team from Trowers and Hamlins; Sarah Souter and Claire Atkins.

Conclusion

The period from April to June 2025 was marked by intense lateral activity, driven by post-merger shifts, US law firms continuing to expand their market share within London, sector-specific demand in finance and disputes, and optimism in real estate and infrastructure.

Looking ahead at the second half of 2025, we might expect to see:

  • Firms are currently engaged in extravagant compensation battles, notwithstanding the ongoing trend with US law firms getting rid of their all-equity partnership models – it could be expected that firms that are holding out on restructuring their compensation levels would stand to see more attrition as the year goes on.
  • London firms are heavily investing in AI and legal tech, and it is expected that there will continue to be a good deal of movement in these areas as firms vie for the top talent.
  • Looming trade-wars and potential economic slowdown could spur more advisory and litigation needs amid uncertain political and economic landscapes.
  • A&O Shearman has seen relatively significant attrition in 2025, losing 15 partners in London alone. This post-merger disruption might be echoed with HSF Kramer and the recently announced McDermott Will & Schulte.

The UK Legal Market in 2025: A Five-Year Transformation

legal courts
legal courts

Five years on from the seismic shifts of 2020, the UK legal market in 2025 is a markedly different landscape. The post-pandemic era has brought about significant structural change, consolidation and cultural transformation across the sector. Law firms have adapted in ways that would have been inconceivable pre-COVID - embracing flexibility, technology and a more client-centric approach. But while some have thrived, others have struggled to adjust.

Below, we explore how the UK legal market has evolved since 2020 - focusing on firm mergers, lateral hiring trends, cultural shifts and the pressures facing those that failed to keep pace.

Post-Pandemic Resilience and Reinvention

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 forced law firms to adapt rapidly, with remote working, digital courtrooms and transformed client service models becoming the norm almost overnight. What began as a contingency plan has since solidified into permanent change.

By 2025, hybrid working is standard across most UK firms. The rigid 9-to-5, office-based structure has given way to a more flexible, output-driven environment. Firms like Clifford Chance, Linklaters and A&O Shearman now operate with formalised hybrid frameworks, with lawyers typically in the office 2–3 days a week. This has supported greater work-life balance but also increased expectations around responsiveness and digital proficiency.

The pandemic also exposed inefficiencies in the traditional law firm model. In response, firms have significantly invested in legal tech, knowledge platforms and AI-powered research tools. Legal project management and client-facing dashboards have become crucial differentiators, as clients demand greater transparency, efficiency and value.

Consolidation Through Mergers

The past five years have seen a surge in law firm mergers, both domestic and international. These combinations are often driven by client demand for global reach, deeper expertise and seamless cross-border service.

Key examples include:

  • Mishcon de Reya and Taylor Vinters (2023):This merger created a hybrid firm focused on private wealth, innovation and fast-growth businesses. It allowed Mishcon to strengthen its reputation in the start-up and venture capital space while preserving its private client heritage. It also demonstrated how firms are broadening their market reach through strategic cultural alignment.
  • Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling (2024):The formation of A&O Shearman marked a milestone in transatlantic legal mergers, creating a £2.9 billion global giant with extensive UK and US capability. It set off a chain reaction of merger conversations among peer firms.
  • Locke Lord and Troutman Pepper (2025):This significant US merger created a new player with enhanced national scale, sector strength and global ambition. While primarily US-focused, the implications are being felt in London as the new entity eyes growth in energy, insurance and cross-border regulatory work.

These mergers reflect a broader strategic shift: clients want integrated service and deeper benches, and firms are increasingly finding that consolidation is the fastest route to achieve that.

Lateral Movement and Team Hires

The post-pandemic legal hiring market has been one of the most active in recent memory. Lateral partner and team movement, particularly in London, has been at record levels.

  • Private equity, leveraged finance and funds teams remain hot property, fuelled by a post-COVID deal boom and high client demand.
  • US firms in London - notably Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins and Paul Hastings - have continued to recruit aggressively from UK firms, often with eye-watering compensation packages.
  • Regulatory, ESG and white-collar teams are also seeing increased demand, as clients face rising scrutiny on governance, sustainability and compliance.

In response, UK firms are refining their retention strategies - offering greater flexibility, faster promotion tracks and equity incentives to retain top performers.

Winners and Losers: Firms Under Pressure

While many firms have modernised and adapted, not all have weathered the storm equally.

Rosenblatt is a cautionary tale. Once a standout for its listed structure and high-growth narrative, the firm has faced declining revenues, leadership instability and public scrutiny over its strategic direction. Despite early moves to diversify income streams through litigation finance and advisory services, it struggled to achieve sustainable profitability and scale in a post-COVID market that favours larger, integrated players.

Other mid-sized firms without a clear niche or international capability have also found the landscape tougher. A lack of investment in tech, overdependence on transactional income, and an inability to retain top talent have left some firms vulnerable.

The market is becoming more polarised, rewarding firms that are bold, differentiated and tech-savvy, while putting pressure on those that remain stagnant or overly traditional.

Shifting Firm Culture and the Rise of “Purpose”

Perhaps the most profound transformation since 2020 has been cultural. The traditional law firm model – defined by long hours, hierarchy and limited transparency - has undergone a slow but meaningful redefinition.

There’s now a clear shift towards:

  • Mental health and wellbeing: Firms such as Dentons and Mishcon de Reya have invested in structured mental health programmes, recognising that sustainable performance requires support, not just pressure.
  • DE&I transparency: Firms like Pinsent Masons and Slaughter and May have embraced public accountability, publishing annual DE&I metrics and setting targets at board level.
  • Purpose-driven leadership: Increasingly, lawyers - particularly younger ones - expect firms to act ethically and align with social impact goals. This is shaping recruitment, client relationships and even firm strategy.

Tech-Driven Client Expectations

Technology has become a core part of legal service delivery - not just in back-end operations, but client-facing experience too. The shift to digital is now an expectation rather than an option.

Clients want faster turnaround, clearer communication and predictable pricing. Firms are meeting these expectations through investment in AI, workflow automation, digital portals and collaborative platforms. Those lagging behind risk being seen as inefficient or outdated.

Conclusion

The UK legal market in 2025 is more global, consolidated, agile and culturally evolved than it was in 2020. The pandemic was a catalyst - not just for remote working, but for long-overdue structural and cultural change.

Firms that embraced transformation - whether through mergers, innovation or a stronger people-first culture - are now reaping the benefits. At the same time, those that lacked clarity, investment or adaptability are struggling to keep up.

As the market continues to evolve, the firms that succeed will be those who keep adapting - balancing scale with empathy, efficiency with ethics and tradition with transformation.

get in touch

If you need help to hire legal professionals for your firm, or seek your next legal career move, please get in touch with Chris Excell on chrisexcell@srmrecruitment.com or call +44 (0)7946 142731

Legal Movers and Shakers in 2025: Lateral Moves in Q1

lawyer shaking hands
lawyer shaking hands

The first quarter of 2025 has seen a significant amount of partner moves within London’s legal market.

According to Edwards Gibson, there were 155 partner moves in January and February alone, a 49% increase from 2024. This uptick was partly due to the dissolution of Memery Crystal, which led to 20 partners seeking new homes. Firms like Fladgate capitalised on this, taking over nine partners from the firm.

We collated our own data, looking at a selection of 160 lateral moves from January, February and March 2025. Information on these moves were sourced from various legal publications and online databases. Using this snapshot of the lateral moves market we are able to look at some potential trends for 2025.

Key Trends in Lateral Partner Moves

1. US Firms Continue Their London Expansion

US law firms have been at the forefront of lateral hiring in London, aggressively attracting top-tier talent from UK firms and international competitors. This trend reflects their sustained commitment to expanding their foothold in the London legal market, particularly in corporate, finance, and private equity law.

  • Akin Gump significantly strengthened its corporate and tax teams, hiring Daniel Wayte from Orrick, Alexander Malahais from White & Case, and Natasha Kaye from Cooley.

  • Kirkland & Ellis continued its dominant expansion strategy from 2024 by recruiting Albert Weatherill from Norton Rose Fulbright.

  • Latham & Watkins bolstered its London office with Hugh O’Sullivan from Goodwin, Serena Lee from Akin Gump, as well as Sophie Goossens joining from Reed Smith to enhance the Artificial Intelligence, Communications and Copyright practice.

  • Gibson Dunn also implemented an assertive acquisition strategy, hiring James O'Donnell from DLA Piper, Mark Manson-Bahr from A&O Shearman, and Presley Warner and Chris Howard from Sullivan & Cromwell.

According to industry reports from The Lawyer and Legal Business, US firms continue to outcompete UK firms on compensation, offering salary packages exceeding £2 million per annum for top lateral hires. The dominance of US firms in London's legal market is expected to persist throughout 2025.

2. Corporate, Banking & Finance, and Disputes Practices Dominate Hiring

Disputes, Corporate, and Finance have remained the most sought-after practice areas for lateral moves, with major firms reinforcing their transactional teams to respond to increasing client demand.

  • 36 of the hires we analysed were for contentious partners, Finance had 32 moves and Corporate was third at 24.

  • Cadwalader expanded its funds finance division by recruiting Doug Murning and Matthew Worth from Ashurst and Bronwen Jones from Reed Smith.

  • Clifford Chance brought in Aimee Sharman and Matt Lilley as a team from Mayer Brown, as well as M&A specialist Bruce Embley from Skadden.

  • CMS gained product liability partners Simon Castley and Sarah Croft from Shook, Hardy, Bacon following the closure of their London office in January.

A report from Financial Times Legal suggests that firms are responding to a global surge in private capital and structured finance transactions, which are expected to grow by 15% in 2025. As a result, firms are investing heavily in top talent within these sectors.

3. Female Partner Moves on the Rise

Gender diversity at the partner level has been an increasing focus for law firms, and our dataset of 160 moves featured female partner moves 51 times, roughly 46%.

  • Monica Gogna moves from EY to Squire Patton Boggs, bringing across a four-lawyer team with her.

  • Jade MacIntyre left Deloitte to join Lewis Silkin, marking a significant shift in intellectual property and regulatory practices.

  • Danielle Carr joined Browne Jacobson from Rosenblatt as their new Head of Commercial Disputes in London.

This increase aligns with industry-wide diversity initiatives, such as The 30% Club and Chambers Diversity & Inclusion, which emphasise the need for greater female representation at senior levels in law firms.

4. Firms Experiencing the Most Partner Losses

While our data is not indicative of every move that took place in the market, some firms stood out as experiencing high amounts of attrition fairly early on.

DLA Piper and Kennedys recorded at least five partner losses this quarter, while White & Case, BCLP and A&O Shearman lost four:

  • DLA Piper saw themselves losing Jeremy Andrews, James O'Donnell, Paul Gray, Sarah Smith, and Joel Eytle.

  • Kennedys lost Christopher Dunn, Mark Lloyd, Jonathan Evans and Michael Biltoo, and they also lost Disputes partner Kavan Bakhda.

  • White & Case lost Alexander Malahais, Mark Castillo-Bernaus, Chris McCarry, and Simon Caridia.

  • BCLP lost Andrew Leitch, Edward Coulson, Kyle O’Sullivan and Kurt Ma.

  • A&O lost Gordon Houseman, Mark Manson-Bahr, Helen Biggin and David Stone.

Please note that we did not include Memery Crystal attrition in this data set, however, the firm did lose at least 20 partners, though four of those were not technically laterals as they joined Lawrence Stephens as directors.

5. Strategic Team Acquisitions Shape the Market

Several firms pursued team acquisitions rather than isolated lateral hires, strengthening their practices through strategic group moves.

  • Fladgate capitalised on Memery Crystal’s dissolution, absorbing nine of its partners to bolster its corporate and private client teams.

  • DWF recruited a four-partner marine insurance team from Kennedys, led by Chris Dunn.

  • McDermott Will & Emery recruited Daniel Weston and Jamie Burgess from CMS, reinforcing its private equity practice.

According to Bloomberg Law, team hires are becoming a preferred strategy for firms seeking immediate market impact and seamless client transitions, allowing for stronger business continuity, and this is something that we would expect to continue throughout 2025.

Looking Ahead: What to Expect for the Rest of 2025

Based on Q1 trends, the legal industry should expect:

  • Continued dominance of US firms in lateral hiring, particularly around private equity and finance.

  • Further retention challenges for UK-based firms as pay wars escalate, which could drive increased lateral movement.

  • Growth in litigation and restructuring hires, as firms prepare for potential economic downturns and increased disputes.

With an increasingly competitive legal market, firms will need to balance talent acquisition with effective retention strategies to remain competitive. As partner mobility continues to shape the industry, the London legal market is set for further transformation throughout 2025.

The Hidden Dangers of AI: A Conversation We Can’t Afford to Ignore

dangerous AI
dangerous AI

AI is no longer just the stuff of sci-fi movies - it’s shaping our reality. From transforming industries to powering everyday tools, its potential is exciting BUT is it also dangerous?

Here are some of the areas where the power and limitless possibilities with AI could, coupled with our human desire to get answers as quickly as possible, lead to hidden dangers:

Data

AI systems are only as good as the data they’re trained on. If the data is biased or wrong to begin with, then the outcomes will be too. This can lead to decisions being made or changed based on incorrect data. If companies are using AI to determine or form part of their decision-making then that data needs to be secure and correct.

Data: a recruitment-related case study

A few years ago, Amazon developed an AI hiring tool to streamline recruitment, but it was scrapped after it was found to favour male candidates. Trained on past hiring data (which was mostly male) the AI penalised CVs that signalled female involvement. This case highlights key lessons on the importance of unbiased data in AI-driven hiring:

  • Biased Data In, Biased Outcomes Out: Amazon’s AI learned from a decade of male-dominated hiring, leading it to favour men and penalise terms like "women’s".
  • AI Amplifies Human Bias: Rather than improving fairness, the AI reinforced gender disparities, proving that biased data leads to biased decisions.
  • Good Data is Essential: AI must be trained on diverse, balanced data to avoid replicating past biases. Without careful oversight, AI will perpetuate inequality.

Innovation or Intrusion?

Facial recognition, behaviour tracking, endless data analysis - AI's ability to collect and process information in a split second is unparalleled. But could this great power lead to an erosion of privacy

Automation vs Jobs

Will AI mean we are all out of a job… unlikely. The speed that automation is coming in will create opportunities in some areas, but could lead to a reduction in manpower in others, particularly in tasks that are repetitive.

Creativity

Are we poorer at maths than those before us because we grew up with a calculator to tell us the answer? AI is the ‘cheat’ to creativity that is almost impossible to resist. Will AI make humans lazy resulting in less creativity? Creativity is the cornerstone of innovation, but will we let AI be our innovators?

Regulation

As innovation races forward, regulation struggles to keep pace. From deepfakes to autonomous weapons, the risks of unchecked AI are no joke. Although the EU last year implemented a new AI act which will ban certain “unacceptable risk” AI systems, both the UK and US are wanting to remain attractive to AI investment so are offering a lighter touch more flexible approach.

So, what’s the solution?

We need to prioritise responsible innovation. Businesses, policymakers, and individuals all have a role to play in ensuring AI serves humanity, not the other way around. Transparency, accountability and collaboration are the watchwords for a future where AI empowers rather than exploits.

AI isn’t good or bad - it’s a tool, just like fire. Fire can cook your food, warm your home, and power entire cities. But, if it’s not handled responsibly or gets out of control, it can also hurt people or even burn down entire forests. AI, like fire, isn’t the enemy – it is how we utilise and control it that is key!

Get in touch

David Kingston is our Head of Technology & Transformation Recruitment. If you need help to hire or are looking for you next role in this space, please contact him on davidkingston@srmrecruitment.com

National Careers Week: inspiring and guiding the next generation

ncw tired
ncw tired

"That was a great day Dad, but I. AM. SHATTERED!"

These were the words of my son, George (13) after spending a full day in our offices at SRM Recruitment HQ in Farringdon for National Careers Week.

National Careers Week (NCW), held annually in the UK, is a dedicated event aimed at empowering young individuals with comprehensive career guidance and resources. In 2025, NCW took place from March 3rd to 8th, offering a plethora of events, workshops, and seminars designed to illuminate various career pathways and opportunities.

This year, my son George embraced the spirit of NCW by participating in a job-shadowing experience at my workplace. His school actively encouraged students to engage with their parents' professions, providing a first-hand glimpse into the working world.

A busy but valuable day

George's day commenced with shadowing me in the office, where he observed daily operations and team dynamics. He attended three client meetings, gaining insights into professional communication and problem-solving strategies. The team welcomed him warmly, and we all enjoyed a pizza lunch together, offering George an informal setting to interact and ask questions. After the final client meeting, we headed home, with George understandably exhausted but (hopefully) enriched by the day's experiences.

The benefits of job shadowing

Job shadowing offers invaluable benefits, especially for young students. It allows them to experience a "day in the life" of a professional, helping to clarify career interests and link classroom learning to real-world applications. Such experiences can significantly boost career confidence and motivation.

George's participation not only provided him with practical insights into the working world, but also sparked meaningful conversations about his future aspirations and the diverse career paths available to him. This hands-on approach to career education exemplifies the essence of National Careers Week, bridging the gap between academic learning and the professional world.

The importance of guiding the next generation

I encourage fellow professionals to involve their children in similar experiences, fostering early career exploration and informed decision-making. National Careers Week serves as a reminder of the collective role we play in guiding the next generation towards fulfilling and informed career choices.

As for George, he finished the day buzzing but looking forward to an early night (for once)! It remains to be seen if he’ll be following his Dad into the heady heights of Tax Recruitment, but regardless I know he found it an incredibly worthwhile experience. It's so important for our youngsters to get some exposure to the working world early on to help inspire them for their future!

You can find out more about National Careers Week here: nationalcareersweek.com

You might also find this article interesting: Five reasons why job shadowing helps benefit your future career: https://bnd.nd.gov/job-shadowing/

national careers week

The Critical Role of Cultural Fit in Hiring

Culture fit team working
Culture fit team working

Hiring the right candidate isn’t just about technical skills and experience. While a strong CV may open doors, long-term success hinges on how well a candidate aligns with your company’s culture.

Neglecting cultural fit can lead to poor retention, reduced productivity, and team conflicts. That’s why assessing cultural alignment during the hiring process is crucial.

Why Cultural Fit Matters

Company culture defines the environment, values, and workplace dynamics of an organisation. Employees who align with your culture are more engaged, productive, and likely to stay long-term.

However, cultural fit doesn’t mean hiring the same personality type. Instead, focus on “culture add” – candidates who align with your core values while bringing fresh perspectives. A diverse team that shares values but offers different viewpoints fosters innovation and growth.

For example, if your team is highly analytical, a culture add might be someone with creative problem-solving skills who challenges conventional thinking. This enhances decision-making and fosters a more dynamic work environment.

Communicating Culture Clearly

Many companies assume they prioritise cultural fit but fail to define or communicate their culture effectively. Candidates want to understand your workplace environment before accepting a role. Transparency in job descriptions, careers pages, and interviews helps attract the right talent.

Risks of Overlooking Cultural Fit

Failing to assess cultural fit can negatively impact your business. Key risks include:

  • High Turnover – Employees who struggle to integrate often leave, leading to increased recruitment and training costs.
  • Reduced Team Morale – A misaligned hire can disrupt workflows, leading to frustration and disengagement.
  • Weakened Customer Relations – Employees who don’t embody company values may struggle in client-facing roles.
  • Workplace Adaptation Issues – A poor fit may struggle with communication styles, collaboration, and expectations.

How to Assess Cultural Fit in Interviews

Hiring managers can integrate cultural fit assessments into their process with these methods:

  1. Behavioural Interview Questions

Assess how candidates have handled past situations to gauge their work style and values:

  • Teamwork: “Describe a time when you worked with a difficult colleague. How did you handle it?”
  • Values: “What are the three most important things to you in a job?”
  • Adaptability: “Tell me about a major change you faced. How did you adapt?”
  • Culture Add: “Describe a recent moment when you felt engaged and productive at work. What contributed to that?”
  1. Practical Assessments

Real-world tasks provide insight into a candidate’s problem-solving and communication style:

  • Marketing candidates – Analyse a campaign and suggest improvements. This demonstrates strategic thinking, creativity, and an understanding of audience engagement.
  • Customer service candidates – Handle a difficult client scenario. This assesses their ability to stay calm under pressure, problem-solve, and communicate effectively.
  • HR candidates – Resolve a workplace conflict. This highlights their interpersonal skills, conflict resolution abilities, and alignment with company values.
  1. Culture-Focused Interactions

Introduce candidates to team members or discuss real-life workplace scenarios. This allows you to assess how they react and whether they would thrive in your environment.

Additionally, ensure candidates have a clear picture of your company culture. Use job descriptions, interviews, and platforms like Glassdoor to communicate expectations.

  1. Temporary-to-Permanent Hiring

If feasible, hiring on a temp-to-perm basis allows for real-world assessment before making a long-term commitment.

Encouraging Open Conversations About Culture

Cultural fit isn’t just about hiring - it’s about maintaining an environment where employees feel comfortable discussing and shaping workplace culture. Regular feedback and open conversations can help strengthen team cohesion and improve retention.

Conclusion

Assessing cultural fit during hiring is an investment in long-term success. A structured approach that evaluates both technical skills and cultural alignment ensures that new hires integrate well and contribute positively. By prioritising transparency and the right screening techniques, businesses can improve retention, enhance team dynamics, and build a workforce that thrives together.

Quick Checklist for Hiring Managers

✅ Define your company’s core values and workplace culture.
✅ Communicate these values clearly in job descriptions.
✅ Use behavioural interview questions to assess cultural alignment.
✅ Incorporate real-world assessments to evaluate work style.
✅ Involve current team members in the interview process.
✅ Ensure candidates have a clear understanding of company culture before hiring.
✅ Consider temp-to-perm hiring when appropriate.